Re: How vulnerable can it be?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: How vulnerable can it be?
From: Peter Gordon <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 21:09:07 -0700
In-reply-to: <449CABB3.10808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Openpgp: id=FFC19479; url=http://www.thecodergeek.com/peter.asc
References: <m27j37fthv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <449C9CC7.90402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <449CA212.6080901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <449CABB3.10808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614)

Ah, I see. Thanks for your explanation, Jim! :)

-- 
Peter Gordon (codergeek42)
GnuPG Public Key ID: 0xFFC19479 / Fingerprint:
  DD68 A414 56BD 6368 D957 9666 4268 CB7A FFC1 9479

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

References:
- How vulnerable can it be?
  - From: Leon
- Re: How vulnerable can it be?
  - From: Jim Cornette
- Re: How vulnerable can it be?
  - From: Peter Gordon
- Re: How vulnerable can it be?
  - From: Jim Cornette

Prev by Date: Re: kernel-2.6.17-1.2139_FC5 problem with ipw2200
Next by Date: Re: Wireless Tools and kernel-2.6.17-1.xx
Previous by thread: Re: How vulnerable can it be?
Next by thread: problems upgrading from evolution 2.0.4 to 2.6.2 in fc3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]