How vulnerable can it be?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: How vulnerable can it be?
• From: Leon <sdl.web@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:32:28 +0100
• Cancel-lock: sha1:9wmMTd351QjgSLPISrTKNgW8nv0=
• Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAEAAAAASCAMAAADc8SgQAAAAwFBMVEUCBQEJDAgTFRIaHBof IB4jJCIrLCotLywyNDE3OTY8Pjs/QD5FRkRJS0hRU1BWV1VbXVpiZGFnaWZrbWptb2xvcW52eHV5 enh+gH2Bg4CHiYaLjYqNj4yRk5CXmZaanJmdn5ygop+mqKWqrKmsrqutr6yxs7CztbK4ure7vbq/ wb7DxcLHycbJy8jNz8vQ0s/T1dLW2NXc3tvf4d7h5ODl5+Po6ufr7enu8O3x8/Dz9fL1+PT4+vf6 /Pn7/fr+//wGuxWtAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAALEwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH1gIaAyMw1+FInQAAAXxJ REFUOMulk+tygjAQhalFWodYvIwyiNUKA95QVLwQhLPv/1ZNAKWX8Yd6ZsLAZvdL9iQo9KSUx0v3 0wV/BjDSzZY6exxw0BJgrqaPApBtQeDK6eEdAGJ4DQhAZjFmWVZf798LmTUi6QGgmQCysHtfeWa1 OXITj8pMYrh9Vz03vmQbEuArMeETSZBPpIdKvMg9B2faL2NKgl3R/zZIuFZnjDW5bKGnrVfmROLk 5LhWqVmEbEcfu8u3+XD14YrvjeEsWRrlyj3QDN/To6u96VVJmkdO40AJAVU4ZQqfInWDhcpRSABi ZQ4MQYusPJ9KRSDhtgEclROBjQhGK8+hfMgdeMICSpGaRf6iU8kuiUzwnXdQ/BJleJ38/pnQ0yUJ g8JDbOxKbnlgtZDQ7Ql/GGzUxZnR7ngBxEHdCMP1rKOD/rVQhlY18aL5BMuczmncTmJnkF4AO9/3 PN9z3e3tW3uciodzFm58LcUCwWgS4drC39Vu3XsqbMu7/Zn8DYna+irHnqnQAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux)

Hi all,

Following the 'yum updates' thread, I have a concern about the
security of FC under this condition:

[1] Yum update every month.
[2] SELinux set to enforced
[3] Only ssh is open.

Thank you!
-- 
Leon

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: How vulnerable can it be?
    • From: Jim Cornette

• Prev by Date: Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
• Next by Date: Re: Ten Reasons To *NOT* Use ZFS:
• Previous by thread: Re-build grub easily?[Scanned]
• Next by thread: Re: How vulnerable can it be?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread