On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 12:03 -0600, Aly Dharshi wrote: > Hello All, > > > B. CDDL might be OK for Fedora, but it's not OK for kernel tree people; > > Until ZFS enters the main tree, ZFS is of little interest for Fedora > > (and/or this list) > > Don't think so, I would be very interested in the a ZFS for Fedora even if it > was something that was just for Fedora, or if someone did up a module that I > could yum into the kernel via a 3rd party site, it maybe a better statement that > it may not be of interest to yourself at this point and time as it stands to but > to generalize this is wrong. If there is a discussion about ZFS and how it > pertains to Linux/Fedora this would be an okay place to discuss it in my opinion. > > There are I am sure a variety of things that are not okay with the kernel folk > that maybe supplied as 3rd party stuff to make things work. > > Cheers, > > Aly. Oh... guess I was too harsh. Never the less, currently there's no kernel-based ZFS module (that I'm aware of), in-tree or 3'rd party... AFAIK (and correct on my this one...) even the fuse implementation isn't available yet. This discussion, at least for now, is useless...
