On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:47:00 -0500 Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Does this mean you agree with SCO's claim that the portions > of Linux that were originally written by others but as part > of unix are thus covered by the unix copyright and terms? That's a matter for the courts and I have no inside knowledge with which to judge. Apparently many people say the evidence isn't very compelling, but who knows. > Really? Do you think Microsoft has been honest? Yes, they've had to be more "honest" in the sense of feeling competitive pressure that encourages them in directions they wouldn't otherwise pursue. > What functionally do you find missing? This kind of cheap-out suggests you're not really interested in continuing this conversation. We'll just have to agree to disagree. Sean
