Re: FC4 or FC5

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: FC4 or FC5
• From: "Alan M. Evans" <ame1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 15:41:31 -0700
• In-reply-to: <20060614171550.485dce36.seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <02f001c68fc1$92bb0cf0$0301a8c0@xxxxxxxx> <1150298746.12436.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060614130141.74694c31.seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150305921.13395.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060614134444.2b25de41.seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150314799.2251.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060614155827.7f6b154e.seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1150319016.2251.46.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060614171550.485dce36.seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 14:15, Sean wrote:
> That opinion doesn't hold up to scrutiny, Linux has succeeded to the
> measure it has today because of its license and the fact that it
> encourages developers to contribute to projects they don't own.

That line of argument would hold up to scrutiny if GNU/HURD had more
than about 25 actual users. And if there were no developer interest in
Linux before it was GPL'd.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    • From: Sean

• References:
  • RE: FC4 or FC5
    • From: bruce
  • RE: FC4 or FC5
    • From: Les Mikesell
  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    • From: Les Mikesell
  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    • From: Les Mikesell
  • Re: FC4 or FC5
    • From: Les Mikesell

• Prev by Date: Re: FC4 or FC5
• Next by Date: Re: another jerk in my mail box
• Previous by thread: Re: FC4 or FC5
• Next by thread: Re: FC4 or FC5
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread