Re: No PPP in 2.6.16 Kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 02:57 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 06:30:15AM +0000, David Hough wrote:
>  > This one has me baffled. I have a system running quite happily with
>  > kernel 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 and I use it with pptp to establish a VPN
>  > connection. This works fine. However, both my attempts to use 2.6.16
>  > upgrade kernels (both 2111 and 2122, shown below) have failed due to the
>  > errors as found in the system log.
>  > 
>  > The strange thing is that I've got another machine where the upgrade
>  > went quite happily and the PPP modules have installed without arguments.
>  > 
>  > Can anyone tell me what I'm missing? I assume I've lost a module
>  > somewhere although the only one that ppp_generic appears to require is
>  > slhc and that's present.
>  > =========================
>  > Jun 10 09:46:39 robinton modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting ppp_generic
>  > (/lib/modules/2.6.16-1.2122_FC5/kernel/d
>  > rivers/net/ppp_generic.ko): Unknown symbol in module, or unknown
>  > parameter (see dmesg)
>  > Jun 10 09:46:39 robinton kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of
>  > the University of California
>  > Jun 10 09:46:39 robinton kernel: ppp_generic: Unknown symbol
>  > class_simple_device_add
>  > Jun 10 09:46:39 robinton kernel: ppp_generic: Unknown symbol
>  > class_simple_destroy
>  > Jun 10 09:46:39 robinton kernel: ppp_generic: Unknown symbol
>  > class_simple_device_remove
>  > Jun 10 09:46:39 robinton kernel: ppp_generic: Unknown symbol
>  > class_simple_create
> 
> Hmm, I vaguely remember this from quite a while back.
> iirc, it was caused by the pptp package bundling its own (out of date)
> ppp_generic module.  The kernel rpm does include ppp_generic.ko, and it's
> not reliant upon any of those symbols.

MPPE support in pptp prior to kernel 2.6.15 required an out-of-tree
ppp_mppe module, which in turn required a patched ppp_generic. From
2.6.15, MPPE support is included in the upstream kernel and no fiddling
with out-of-tree modules is needed.

Paul.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux