Re: /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc - shouldn't this be a directory?

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc - shouldn't this be a directory?
• From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <mikkel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 16:35:55 -0500
• In-reply-to: <54A12CEA-BED3-41FC-81BB-626CCF7E3D84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Organization: Infinity Ltd.
• References: <F141BE20-50C0-4A4F-A1BE-5E87A2B1D521@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cone.1149448146.894182.18161.500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4483415A.5050309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54A12CEA-BED3-41FC-81BB-626CCF7E3D84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060516)

Ben Lancaster wrote:
> 
> So a quick fix would be to remove the 'misc' file, create a directory in
> its place, and re-install, followed by 'depmod'?
> 
> Ben
> 
Yes.

• References:
  • /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc - shouldn't this be a directory?
    • From: Ben Lancaster
  • Re: /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc - shouldn't this be a directory?
    • From: Sam Varshavchik
  • Re: /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc - shouldn't this be a directory?
    • From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
  • Re: /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc - shouldn't this be a directory?
    • From: Ben Lancaster

• Prev by Date: Re: Add to $PATH how?
• Next by Date: Re: /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc - shouldn't this be a directory?
• Previous by thread: Re: /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc - shouldn't this be a directory?
• Next by thread: Re: /lib/modules/`uname -r`/misc - shouldn't this be a directory?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread