Re: a possible bug with piping ?

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: a possible bug with piping ?
• From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2006 13:49:53 +0100
• In-reply-to: <13dbfe4f0606040517o210ca239gc6191ce498442e86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <13dbfe4f0606040144n4bd0cd91x94f6fbb28f2d9e7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1149422343.3084.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <13dbfe4f0606040517o210ca239gc6191ce498442e86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 14:17 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On 6/4/06, Ambrogio <fn050202@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Probably the space in the first example is not a space, but some other
> > not printable char.
> 
> no it is a space.

Have you been fiddling with the value of the IFS variable?

Paul.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: a possible bug with piping ?
    • From: Chitlesh GOORAH

• References:
  • a possible bug with piping ?
    • From: Chitlesh GOORAH
  • Re: a possible bug with piping ?
    • From: Ambrogio
  • Re: a possible bug with piping ?
    • From: Chitlesh GOORAH

• Prev by Date: Re: route, default route, eth0 and eth1
• Next by Date: Re: sendmail questions about deferred messages
• Previous by thread: Re: a possible bug with piping ?
• Next by thread: Re: a possible bug with piping ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread