New clean install of FC5. Error from running find command: [root@ws-ai ~]# find / -name "ipop*" -print /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/ipop3d /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/ipop3d.conf find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /selinux: this may be a bug in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that should have been searched. I recommended they run fsck on the file systems to identify and fix any problems. [root@ws-ai ~]# fsck -n -f -v fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005) e2fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005) Warning! /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 is mounted. Warning: skipping journal recovery because doing a read-only filesystem check. Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes Pass 2: Checking directory structure Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity Pass 4: Checking reference counts Pass 5: Checking group summary information Free blocks count wrong (24775172, counted=24775130). Fix? no Free inodes count wrong (26281629, counted=26281429). Fix? no /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors ********** 129379 inodes used (0%) 529 non-contiguous inodes (0.4%) # of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 7354/55/0 1619452 blocks used (6%) 0 bad blocks 1 large file 111241 regular files 8766 directories 1 character device file 1 block device file 1 fifo 3735 links 9532 symbolic links (9400 fast symbolic links) 28 sockets -------- 133305 files Subsequent runs of fsck to actually fix the problems does not appear to work. I even had them put the file /forcefsck on the system and reboot. Same issues. The results of the fsck seem to vary slightly. Harddrive tests have been run on the drives. System info: FC-5 on ws-ai Intel Celeron 2.8ghz WD3200JD-22KLB0 320gig SATA hard drive [root@ws-ai ~]# uname -a Linux ws-ai.ai.lan 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 #1 Tue Mar 14 15:48:33 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux He also tried a standard IDE drive with similar results and also had similar results on a different system. I searched bugzilla but did not find anything similar. I have filed a bug report #190347. At this point he is considering reverting back to RH8. Anyone have suggestions?