New clean install of FC5.
Error from running find command:
[root@ws-ai ~]# find / -name "ipop*" -print
/usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services/ipop3d
/usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/ipop3d.conf
find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /selinux: this may be a bug
in your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf
option. Earlier results may have failed to include directories that
should have been searched.
I recommended they run fsck on the file systems to identify and fix any
problems.
[root@ws-ai ~]# fsck -n -f -v
fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005)
e2fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005)
Warning! /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 is mounted.
Warning: skipping journal recovery because doing a read-only filesystem
check.
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Free blocks count wrong (24775172, counted=24775130).
Fix? no
Free inodes count wrong (26281629, counted=26281429).
Fix? no
/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has
errors **********
129379 inodes used (0%)
529 non-contiguous inodes (0.4%)
# of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 7354/55/0
1619452 blocks used (6%)
0 bad blocks
1 large file
111241 regular files
8766 directories
1 character device file
1 block device file
1 fifo
3735 links
9532 symbolic links (9400 fast symbolic links)
28 sockets
--------
133305 files
Subsequent runs of fsck to actually fix the problems does not appear to
work. I even had them put the file /forcefsck on the system and reboot.
Same issues. The results of the fsck seem to vary slightly.
Harddrive tests have been run on the drives.
System info:
FC-5 on ws-ai
Intel Celeron 2.8ghz
WD3200JD-22KLB0 320gig SATA hard drive
[root@ws-ai ~]# uname -a
Linux ws-ai.ai.lan 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 #1 Tue Mar 14 15:48:33 EST 2006
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
He also tried a standard IDE drive with similar results and also had
similar results on a different system.
I searched bugzilla but did not find anything similar. I have filed a
bug report #190347.
At this point he is considering reverting back to RH8.
Anyone have suggestions?
