find issue led to possible fsck bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


New clean install of FC5.

Error from running find command:

[root@ws-ai ~]# find / -name "ipop*" -print
find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /selinux: this may be a bug
in your filesystem driver.  Automatically turning on find's -noleaf
option.  Earlier results may have failed to include directories that
should have been searched.

I recommended they run fsck on the file systems to identify and fix any

[root@ws-ai ~]# fsck -n -f -v
fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005)
e2fsck 1.38 (30-Jun-2005)
Warning!  /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 is mounted.
Warning: skipping journal recovery because doing a read-only filesystem
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Free blocks count wrong (24775172, counted=24775130).
Fix? no

Free inodes count wrong (26281629, counted=26281429).
Fix? no

/dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has
errors **********

  129379 inodes used (0%)
     529 non-contiguous inodes (0.4%)
         # of inodes with ind/dind/tind blocks: 7354/55/0
 1619452 blocks used (6%)
       0 bad blocks
       1 large file

  111241 regular files
    8766 directories
       1 character device file
       1 block device file
       1 fifo
    3735 links
    9532 symbolic links (9400 fast symbolic links)
      28 sockets
  133305 files

Subsequent runs of fsck to actually fix the problems does not appear to
work.  I even had them put the file /forcefsck on the system and reboot.
Same issues.  The results of the fsck seem to vary slightly.

Harddrive tests have been run on the drives.

System info:

FC-5 on ws-ai
Intel Celeron 2.8ghz
WD3200JD-22KLB0 320gig SATA hard drive

[root@ws-ai ~]# uname -a
Linux 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 #1 Tue Mar 14 15:48:33 EST 2006
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

He also tried a standard IDE drive with similar results and also had
similar results on a different system.

I searched bugzilla but did not find anything similar.  I have filed a
bug report #190347.

At this point he is considering reverting back to RH8.

Anyone have suggestions?

[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux