On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 14:35 -0400, Rickey Moore wrote: > found two dead links against the old /usr/X11/bin/X > and /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkbd Geeezz... X11 doesn't exist anymore > (<sigh> now everydarn thing is in /usr/bin) I can understand the move away from /usr/X11... but why didn't it go to /usr/share/X11 or something like that, rather than straight into the root trees? If I do a "ls -l /etc/X11", I also find two dead links, thus: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Nov 4 01:41 X -> ../../usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Sep 23 2005 X.rpmsave -> ../../usr/X11R6/bin/Xorg I expect the second one (the rpmsave) does no harm, but I don't like the looks of the first. What's really odd, is that despite the listing highlighting the link as broken (inverse red highlighting), the files *are* where it points to. Though the Xorg file (in /usr/X11R6/bin/) is also oddly highlighted in inverse red. I presume that's due to the owner sticky bit being set. -rws--x--x 1 root root 2191903 Sep 22 2005 Xorg My system was a clean install, and normal updates via YUM. -- (Currently running FC4, in case that's important to the thread) Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
