-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ded wrote: > Concerning, for example, mutt. An older version, 1.4.2 from 2004 I > believe, is installed by default. 1.4.2.1 is the current "stable" mutt release and what FC includes (for all releases I believe, certainly for the supported releases). > I always compile my own with some of the third party patches > referenced on mutt.org. Yep, same here. :) > If I want to share these do I just need to put them on my site or > can I submit them to a developer or ? What's the procedure? Are you looking to get these patches included in the stock FC release? If so, I'd check if there are any such requests open in bugzilla already and add them there or create one if there aren't. I'm not sure if FC would include the "unstable" mutt releases or not. I've never read up to see if that's been discussed on the development list (as I've been in the habit of running my own personally patched mutt since the days of RH6). It might be useful to search the archives of the development list or ask there for some advice. - -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xD654075A | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ====================================================================== I never met a morphosis I didn't like. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: When crypto is outlawed bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl. iG0EARECAC0FAkRRTiMmGGh0dHA6Ly93d3cucG9ib3guY29tL350bXovcGdwL3Rt ei5hc2MACgkQuv+09NZUB1rU7gCgs6LzNU9CG/rR0Hii7N3zTBV8LPcAn2PXSnt0 7vxRsbfZv3+udi8P5u2X =2itA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
