Re: Is wireless support any better with FC5?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Is wireless support any better with FC5?
From: Chris Jones <jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:58:05 +0100
In-reply-to: <200604211022.33281.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: University of Cambridge
References: <1145458050.1926.18.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200604210831.01396.jonesc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200604211213.41628.alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200604211022.33281.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1.SL3 (X11/20051013)

Do you use encryption? I have a laptop with the same ipw2200, which will beupgraded soon, and I want to use WPA-PSK, just as I can in the windows setup.

Not sure about 2200, but with 2100 I tried getting WPA working withwpa_supplicant and NetworkManager. In the end I failed, I think becausethe current kernels come with 2100 v1.1.3 and I need the v1.2.x series ?


Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is wireless support any better with FC5?
  - From: Anne Wilson

References:
- Is wireless support any better with FC5?
  - From: James Pifer
- Re: Is wireless support any better with FC5?
  - From: Chris Jones
- Re: Is wireless support any better with FC5?
  - From: Alexander Mamchenkov
- Re: Is wireless support any better with FC5?
  - From: Anne Wilson

Prev by Date: Re: CANNOT Get Remote X to Work -- Guru Needed
Next by Date: Re: FC5 Network nightmare
Previous by thread: Re: Is wireless support any better with FC5?
Next by thread: Re: Is wireless support any better with FC5?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]