----- Forwarded message from Michal Ludvig <michal@xxxxxxxx> ----- From: Michal Ludvig <michal@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:36:54 +1200 To: openssl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx CC: appro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: PadLock engine in 0.9.8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060317) Reply-To: openssl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx Hi, several users have complained that the padlock engine is not usable in new distros like Fedora 5 or OpenSUSE 10.1 that come with 0.9.8a. There was apparently some reorganization of engines to dynamically loadable modules. I haven't followed OpenSSL development for a while, could you give be a brief overview of what needs to be done to have PadLock usable again? BTW Fedora people came up with something like: http://www.logix.cz/michal/devel/padlock/openssl-0.9.8a-padlock.patch which makes the padlock engine static again (and usable again ;-). Is that an acceptable approach? I somehow doubt so. What's the correct way to fix it? Thanks! Michal ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx Automated List Manager majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxx ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
