Re: Can LVM1 read an LVM2 volume?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 09:45 +0100, William Murray wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 09:25 +0100, William Murray wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 07:26 -0400, fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Another possibility might be to try converting your LVM2 volume group
> > > to 
> > > LVM1 using vgconvert in FC5.
> > > 
> > > Paul.
> > > 
> >   Paul, you are really helpful. But I got myself into more knots.
> > vgconvert said:
> >   lv_number -19205086645 too large
> >  ...
> >   Use pvcreate and vgcfgrestore to repair from archived metadata
> > 
> > But now vgdisplay, vgconvert, vgscan, pvscan  all give 'segmentation
> > fault' and the disk  claims to be uninitialised for the graphical lvm
> > client. 
> >     Do you think there is a way to recover this?
> >    Sorry,
> >        Bill 
>   I guess I was being stupid - I tried this with the filesystem mounted.
> Anyway, the file-system is still mounted, and I think my best bet is 
> to save the bits I want (its interesting how despite a backup there are
> still bits I want) and start over.

I guess you learned the hard way why you should NEVER do filesystem
operations that will modify the filesystem or partition data on a
running system.  
LVM, fsck, and fdisk are all tools that come to mind quickly (among
others) that have a possibility to destroy your data if used improperly 

Note, some parts of the lvm tools can be used if done correctly, but it
is safer to not do so.

What happens with those types of tools is the kernel knows the config at
boot time, but does not get told of the changes until the next reboot.
It can easily wipe out an entire drives worth of data.


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux