I reinstalled FC5 without using LVM. Now I can boot kernel-xen0 without any problem. I guess I'll use it in this mode and figure out the LVM and kernel-xen0 problem later. Thanks for all who offerred help. On 4/10/06, Fong Vang <sudoyang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So, looks like I'm back at the beginning. Has anyone gotten LVM and > Xen to work together in FC5? Has anyone gotten Xen to work under FC5? > > The kernel, ramdisk, and grub configuration look right. > > On 4/8/06, list user <vnstkxehgsznsq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stephen Tweedie wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 12:30 -0700, list user wrote: > > > > > > > > >>You should be able to use a "xenified" kernel to boot without the xen > > >>hypervisor. > > > > > > > > > No, you can't --- that kernel is absolutely dependent on the hypervisor > > > and cannot run on bare hardware. > > > > Sorry for bad advice, Vang. > > > > Thanks for setting me correct there. But now I'm really puzzled. > > > > Apparently xen is being rolled into the kernel at some point in the > > future. Does that mean that those future kernels will actually be > > hypervised? Will the grub stanzas still require a "kernel xen" line > > with "module linux", or the more familiar "kernel linux". > > > > Any insight appreciated. > > > > TIA > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Stephen > > > > > > > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > >
