On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 13:20 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 10:04, Craig White wrote: > > > As for SELinux making a system 'unstable' - I can't envision a scenario > > that SELinux would do that. > > Frequency of updates is a good metric for stability. How many > SELinux updates have been issued since it was experimentally > included in fedora? ---- Since it's new, kernel level and has impact, frequent updates are likely. Many of those packages have been 'policy' updates which means that it isn't stuff that requires restarts but rather new policy definitions of other daemons. Package stability is not the same as system stability. It seems clear that the OP confused his inability to deal with blocks from SELinux with system stability. Craig
