On 3/27/06, Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 08:29 +0200, Roger Grosswiler wrote: > > I've never checked the policy tough...what is standard? permissive? > > i've just installed it yesterday... > > It's probably prest to enforcing then. > > If you use Gnome, there's a "security level" control GUI listed in the > adminstration menu. > > -- > Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. > I read messages from the public lists. > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > I installed FC5 about a week ago on my web server (was FC1 or 2 I believe) and have left the SELinux to default settings and it works well other than I had to use semanage to add permissions for httpd on a non-standard port. At home I did a fresh install as well (was using FC4 at home). For my home system I used the GUI to change SELinux to none as I was having a minor flash plugin install problem. Turns out that wasn't the issue, just a few cobwebs in my head that day I guess. But some of the comments I've seen on the list is that for a home user it's not really a security problem to disable SELinux. But for a server they recommend it. Other than that I am very impressed with FC5. I also note faster bootup as well as faster starting of applications. Two thumbs up here as well. Jacques B.
