On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 19:01 +1030, Tim wrote: > On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 03:16 -0500, Myth User wrote: > > Fedora is a bird that sings in the forest while Windows is a stable > > operating system. > > Now that's just laughable. I've yet to see one that I'd call stable. > If "Windows is stable", they'd all be stable. It's not. It's only > stable under some circumstances, ones I don't get to see. I won't claim > Fedora is any better, but I certainly won't agree with Windows earning > the monika of being stable. > > This must be some new definition of being "stable" that I'm not familiar > with. ---- I find Windows XP pretty stable...probably more stable than FC-4 that I'm using on my desktop but that was an upgrade from FC-1 to FC-3 to FC-4 and I am gonna wipe it all out and install FC-5. Craig
