Thanks Tod, I found these ISOs on more than one of the mirror sites refered by the official Fedora website. Even though i still can not make sure that these files are real FC5 release images. On 3/19/06, Tod Merley <todbot88@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 3/18/06, Yue Feng <2525275@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I found some ISOs on some website or ftpsite with the names of > FC-5-i386-discX.iso : > FC-5-i386-disc1.iso 15-Mar-2006 05:47 655M > FC-5-i386-disc2.iso 15-Mar-2006 05:48 668M > FC-5-i386-disc3.iso 15-Mar-2006 05:50 688M > FC-5-i386-disc4.iso 15-Mar-2006 05:51 688M > FC-5-i386-disc5.iso 15-Mar-2006 05:52 370M > FC-5-i386-rescuecd.iso 15-Mar-2006 05:31 75M > SHA1SUM 15-Mar-2006 06:38 671 > > are these the release version of FC5 ? > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > Hi Yue Feng! > > There are those who would hurt us with fake stuff on the web. Good to check > the source: > > http://fedora.redhat.com/About/schedule/ > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Schedule > > From the weekly news: > > Fedora Core 5 Status > Submitted by ThomasChung on Fri, 2006-03-10 10:39. :: Announcement > > > Due to circumstances outside of our control, we're going to be unable to > keep to the scheduled date of March 15th for the release of FC5 and > instead are going to have to make the release date Monday, March 20th. > While unfortunate in some ways, this gives us the opportunity to pull in > the final GNOME 2.14 tarballs which should be available on Monday > assuming the changes are suitably minor. > > Jeremy Katz > > I would be wary!!! > > Tod > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > >
