Re: routing VS nat: can FC3 just be a router between eth0 <-> ppp0 with no MASQ/NAT???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 16:21 -0500, James Pifer wrote:
> > > 
> > > I tried clearing the masquerade table, then clients can't reach the
> > > remote network. So the FC3 machine, with a connection to eth0 and ppp0,
> > > plus set to act as a router, does not appear to act as a router between
> > > eth0 and ppp0. 
> > > 
> > > Is it possible to make it be a router between eth0 and ppp0 without
> > > masquerade? Just be a router....
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > James
> > > 
> > 
> > Forgive my stupid question, but does each of your machines inside your
> > LAN has a true IP address?
> > 
> > Gilboa
> > 
> 
> If you mean unique address, yes. If you mean internet routable, no, but
> the other side of the vpn is not internet routable either. One side is
> 192.168.1.0 and the other is 10.0.0.0. I'm looking at this more like a
> branch office VPN. The routers on the remote side have static routes to
> know where to find my network. 
> 
> Hope that made sense.
> 
> James
> 

I've built a similar setup @home (and @work) using vtund.
http://dag.wieers.com/packages/vtun/?M=D
(Rebuilt the SRPM to FC4)

Each of the firewalls machines run vtund, giving me secure vpn
connection between the two networks.

Gilboa



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux