Re: OT: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: OT: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
• From: Brian Mury <brianmury@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:38:16 -0400
• In-reply-to: <43F4D1F5.3060607@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <0A9F6584-9E2F-11DA-9519-0030654B1810@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <43F4D1F5.3060607@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 13:26 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote:
> No, I'd like for you to abide by the written rules here: plain ASCII
> english text only, no HTML. See the Fedora web site.

I visited the Fedora web site and could not find the written rules. Do
you have a URL?

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: OT: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
    • From: Chitlesh GOORAH

• References:
  • Re: OT: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
    • From: Joel Rees
  • Re: OT: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
    • From: Mike McCarty

• Prev by Date: Re: a^ (ahat) in error messages from gcc
• Next by Date: Re: KDE: screen-saver "clock" is not operational
• Previous by thread: Re: OT: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
• Next by thread: Re: OT: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread