Christofer C. Bell wrote: > On 2/12/06, Paul Michael Reilly <pmr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So my >> question is: why has the Redhat/Fedora update facility fallen into >> such disrepair? And is there any reason to expect that it will become >> competitive with Microsoft's with FC5 and follow ons?. It would be >> unfortunate to hear that the answer is Redhat Enterprise versions. I >> don't mind paying but I do mind running stale software. I'll pay >> gladly to live on the bleeding edge. Even the lack of Firefox 1.5 with >> FC4 is disturbing, enough to make me wonder what all the fuss over >> Ubuntu is all about. > > a.) It hasn't fallen into "such disrepair." > b.) If you think Fedora isn't "bleeding edge" then you shouldn't be > running Linux at all (it doesn't get much more "bleeding edge.") > c.) If your complaint is solely due to Firefox 1.5 not being out the > door on Fedora yet, go away and stop trolling. > > -- > Chris > > "I trust the Democrats to take away my money, which I can afford. I > trust the Republicans to take away my freedom, which I cannot." > Firefox 1.5 for FC-4 is available. As is Thunderbird 1.5. But you have to make the effort to look for it. Do you know how to use Google? -- David
