On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 17:14 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 23:08 -0800, Bob Taylor wrote: [snip] > > Please show us *where* in the GPL/LGPL are the words "static linking" > > and "Dynamic linking" used? > Nowhere, but it's how the FSF interprets the LGPL/GPL and how courts > have interpreted it, when sentencing SW vendors trying to use GPL'ed SW > in closed source projects. > > > I have to agree with many others here. > > Linux/GNU, as currently licensed is dead in the water for any commercial > > development use. > You are plain wrong. I don't think so. > Linking commercial/closed source works against LGPL'ed libraries doesn't > violate the LGPL, linking them against GPL'ed binaries does. I will have to see a *written, signed by Stallman* letter to that effect. Until then, the words of the license stands. Bob -- brtaylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
