Re: ref: Microsoft barriers to Linux adoption on the desktop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--- Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> >    Would someone show me their copy of Windows running on an
> 8086/8088?
> 
> Hmm. As I recall, Widows 1.0 was pretty bad. I no longer have a
> copy.
> I do have a copy of DesqView, which I have on occasion run on my
> 8088.
> It's been a while now. The 8088 machine is almost (but not quite)
> retired. The hard disc is dead, and it runs off of floppy only.
> 5 1/4 inch, of course.
> 
> > Or for that matter an 80286, except as an interesting toy?  I'm
> willing 
> > to stipulate that MS DOS ran well on those processors.  As did PC
> DOS, 
> > and DRDOS, and CPM/86 (and probably a few more that I'm missing).

Geoworks! It ran on top of DOS, as did Windows, but it would work
well on a 286 and a hercules display, in 64K of memory. I really wish
they would donate it to the world and port it to Linux. You could
load it on that 286 is far less time than OO on a Pentium class
machine, and still do basically the same job. Type and save/print. 

They shoulda been contenders, Ric



================================================
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
   ...the Sin of Ignorance, and 
   ...the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.

Linux user# 44256
Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/
================================================

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux