-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Tuesday 14 February 2006 09:58, Claude Jones wrote: >> On Tue February 14 2006 9:46 am, John Pierce wrote: >>> Claude, if possible, you should document what this is doing and hang >>> on to it. Could be useful by the DOJ. >> I doubt that. Microsoft is very careful about their disclaimers >> regarding their beta software. If you install, it's your gamble, not >> theirs... >> > Those disclaimers are in the eula, right? When was the last time a > click through eula that prevented one from breaking the seal, and which > required the seal to be broken to see, was held up in court? > > I submit it wasn't unless the judge was a golfing buddy for someone at > M$. Actually Gene, I believe the answer is a simple "Never". I don't recall a EULA *ever* being tried sucessfully in court. Someone will surely correct me if I'm wrong, though. Oh, and I Am Not A Lawyer. C. - -- Craig McLean http://fukka.co.uk craig@xxxxxxxxxxx Where the fun never starts Powered by FreeBSD, and GIN! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD8gaPMDDagS2VwJ4RAq9tAJ9218KDZurIqo+JupPwzKF1BGaKjACgtD8f l/Uh6zDjeAgXCd7+KEolUUU= =2T4k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
