J. K. Cliburn wrote: > On 2/8/06, Jacob (=Jouk) Jansen <joukj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>a.apprich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 8-FEB-2006 11:30:21.57 >> >> >>>>>>>I try to get the rsh command working to a FC4 system >> >>[snip] >> >>>what does /var/log/messages tell you about login via rsh? >> >>No Route to host > > > I know you said you have the relevant ports unfiltered in iptables, > but isn't this the typical message received when you attempt to access > a blocked port? > Nope. You will get connection refused if the port is set to reject, and a timeout message if it is set to drop. You get the No route to host when there is a network configuration problem. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
