On 2/3/06, George English <
george.english@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hmmm, I suppose it doesn't really come down to functionality. The gimp and photoshop are equally as useful, but I started using linux after I started using photoshop, so I just prefer using photoshop.
I should use the gimp more often.On 2/3/06, Rickey Moore < wayward4now@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--- Brian Mury < brianmury@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 11:29 -0500, taharka wrote:
> > I'm disappointed to see Adobe Photoshop riding at #1. Not needed
> when
> > you have the gimp.
>
> ...except that gimp can't do some of the stuff that photoshop can
> do,
> and some of that functionality is required by some of us. As a
> photographer I use gimp and photoshop for postprocessing images. I
> wish
> I could use gimp exclusively, but it just doesn't fill all my needs
> at the moment.
I could stand some eduaction if you have a moment. What does gimp
lack? I can't make heads nor tails of one tenth of it, and it's menu
is sorta obscure, but in my own ignarance I am impressed that it
seems to have so much. It would be good to learn which functionality
it needs / doesn't have. Thanks, in advance, Ric
================================================
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
...the Sin of Ignorance, and
...the Sin of Stupidity.
Only the former may be overcome." R.I.P. Dad.
Linux user# 44256
Sign up at: http://counter.li.org/
================================================
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
