Re: belkin wireless g+ desktop card support?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 21:17 +0000, Andy Green wrote:
> Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> 
> > Some (Japan?) only a couple of channels.  I've seen frequency control
> > cited more often than power limits as the reason.  After all, you can
> > tack on an amplifier, range extenders (repeaters) or high gain antenna's
> > (for cards which accept external antenna) for more ERP (Effective
> > Radiated Power).
> 
> I had an interesting chat with Eric Blossom of the Gnu Radio project
> over new year's.  He had given an interesting talk about passive radar,
> using FM radio stations as the illumination and trying to divine echos.
> 
> He seemed to believe the story that there were regulatory issues with
> Open wireless drivers, specifically the frequency control stuff, but he
> had an interesting take on why the Graphics cards manufacturers insist
> on closed drivers, which may be the same reason for the dismal situation
> for manufacturer-created Open drivers.  He had heard that it was because
> the various graphics card manufacturers are infringing each others'
> patents left and right, and if they put the source out there it will
> invite horrible things to happen to them.
> 
This is possible.  This is where 3dfx lost to nVidia and went away.  I
am not sure how much credence I would give to that theory though.

> -Andy
> -- 
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux