Erwin Rol wrote:
[some good information followed by]
You also might want to critically look at your software/hardware on why
you need those timers. Maybe if you explain what you are trying to do
someone has a better/different solution for you that does work with the
normal kernel.
I second this advice. It's pretty abnormal to need 100us resolution
in timing, especially in a "sloppy scheduling environment" like
that provided by the standard Linux kernels. Ask yourself whether
you really really need that, or if you don't have a design
masquerading as requirements. What does this timing requirement
stem from? Surely there is some reason for its existence. That
is probably a real requirement. See if you can accomplish the
same result without needing stringent timing.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
