On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > >I guess I can add my psychotic two cents. I understood Fedora to be > >seriously beta, testing software, which I was encouraged to use, and > >potientially break on the rack of weird hardware or hard usage, in return > >for letting people know about the experience. > > > There is some pretty serious efforts going on to make sure that is not > beta software and it is latest but robust. > > Fedora Bug Triaging - > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers > > Getting a full time QA person exclusively for Fedora -> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2006-January/msg00572.html > > I think the current FC5 test 2 looks good. YMMV. Ok. Perhaps I should have added quotes around "beta". And I didn't mean to sting some hardworking people who are busy keeping bugs out of the field. Still, I understand Fedora releases to be works in progress with a limited expected lifetime, the potiential for issues which need resolving, and support a user community. -- ============================================= If you think Education is expensive Try Ignorance Author Unknown ============================================
