jdow wrote:
From: "Rahul Sundaram" <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx>
Kam Leo wrote:
On 12/29/05, Dave Stevens <geek@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and there's fedorafaq.org. not comprehensive but pretty good and as
far as I
know everything there is accurate, easy to read, etc.
d
[snip]
The only official ones are http://fedora.redhat.com and
http://fedoraproject.org as listed in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites and they are pretty well
coupled together. Rest of the community websites are listed in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CommunityWebsites and managing them is
not really a function of "fedora marketing droids".
Gee, and here I thought he was volunteering to be a Fedora Marketing
Droid, one each, prepackaged and delivered. Last I knew Fedora was not
"marketed" at all by RedHat. It's their beta test group.
{o.o}
IMO, exactly on the mark. But when I have made similar comments,
it always sparks a counter response.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
