On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 12:25 -0800, Skidmore, Stanley G wrote: > Hi Fedora gurus, > I have installed Fedora core 4 on one of my machines and all seems well > except when I begin an update. On every package that I select I receive > an error message that say that there is not a GPG signature associated > with it. Even though they all install and work fine it is a real > annoyance. Does anybody have any idea about how to resolve this? > > Cheers > Stan > If you did a standard install there should be a file /etc/yum.conf and a directory /etc/yum.repos.d In the directory there should be several files ending in .repo (fedora.repo and fedora-updates.repo are of prime interest here). The contents of those .repo files will solve your problem. My fedora-updates.repo file contents (totally as distributed) are below. Note that the lines baseurl and mirrorlist are wrapped by the mailer but a single line in the file. ------------------------------------ [updates-released] name=Fedora Core $releasever - $basearch - Released Updates #baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/$releasever/$basearch/ mirrorlist=http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/updates-released-fc $releasever enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora ----------------------------------------- Note the last line which begins with gpgkey. It tells yum where to look for the gpgkey. Yum should tell you there is no key available, then ask for permission to import the one listed. Let it do the import and you will be all set. Alternatively you can use an rpm command to do the import prior to running yum. # rpm --import /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora > > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:22 AM > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 196 > > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than > "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: net-snmp-perl not the same as Net::SNMP? (Paul Howarth) > 2. problem with openoffice, any OO expert (arun shrimali) > 3. Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert (Paul F. Johnson) > 4. Re: problem with user log in (Thomas Springer) > 5. Re: OT: Very Strange Knode Issue (Tony Nelson) > 6. Re: Fedora Core 4 Update: caching-nameserver-7.3-4.FC4 > (Tony Nelson) > 7. Re: OT: Very Strange Knode Issue (David Cary Hart) > 8. Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert (arun shrimali) > 9. Solved - Re: Lack of PHP syntax errors on FC4 (Gary Stainburn) > 10. Re: Fedora Core 4 Update: caching-nameserver-7.3-4.FC4 > (Craig McLean) > 11. makewhatis causes FC4 to crash (Jonathan Rawle) > 12. Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert (Paul F. Johnson) > 13. Desktop specific icon (Andy Pieters) > 14. Re: Firefox 1.5 (Paul Lemmons) > 15. Re: How to add font (Fernando Augusto) > 16. Re: Problem with mutt (lists@xxxxxxxxx) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:05:07 +0000 > From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: net-snmp-perl not the same as Net::SNMP? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <43A98B43.4050208@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Mike McGrath wrote: > > Can anyone shed some light on net-snmp-perl vs Net::SNMP? I've got a > > program that uses Net::SNMP. I've installed net-snmp-perl. I can see > > > that there is an SNMP.pm on my system, yet when I run the script it > > bombs at "use Net::SNMP" > > > > Can't locate Net/SNMP.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > > nagios-plugins/libexec > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3 > > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3 > > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl > > /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi > > /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6 .) at ./check_ifoperstatus line 41. > > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./check_ifoperstatus line 41. > > > > I'd like to avoid using CPAN to install the modules (as I'm trying to > > package this for Fedora-Extras). I've seen some posts on this as it > > related to FC2 but nothing relating to FC3 or FC4. Any ideas? > > net-snmp-perl and Net::SNMP are two different things. > > net-snmp-perl is the perl bindings for the snmp library at > http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/, which provides an SNMP.pm without the > Net:: prefix. > > Net::SNMP is a perl module from http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-SNMP/ > which provides Net::SNMP (i.e. it would be > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/Net/SNMP.pm). You can find RPMs for > this package in Dag's repo: > http://dag.wieers.com/packages/perl-Net-SNMP/ > > Paul. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:25:36 +0530 > From: arun shrimali <arunudr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: problem with openoffice, any OO expert > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <02a401c60652$410b91c0$98c2003d@aa> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Dear All > > I am working with openoffice 2.0. My problem is that I can not open the > files at my file server (Microsoft - Small business Server), where as > same files open easily by MS Office. Open office give error like " XYZ > file does not exist", can any body help me how to open the files on my > file server ??? > > Arun Shrimali > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051221/1083e2e > 2/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:13:48 +0000 > From: "Paul F. Johnson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1135185228.3343.44.camel@xxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Hi, > > > > > I am working with openoffice 2.0. My problem is that I can not open > > the files at my file server (Microsoft - Small business Server), where > > > as same files open easily by MS Office. Open office give error like " > > XYZ file does not exist", can any body help me how to open the files > > on my file server ??? > > If you make a local copy of the file, will it open then? > > TTFN > > Paul > -- > main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86, > 0,a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a ):3,main (-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?main(2, > _+1,"%s %d > %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de} > +,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r > +:'d*'3,}{w+K > w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l > q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl] > '/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' > iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n 'wk nw' iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; > :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c ;;{nl'-{} > rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# > }'+}## > (!!/"):t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1 > ):0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,"!ek;dc > i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l ,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);} > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:27:20 +0100 > From: Thomas Springer <th.springer@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: problem with user log in > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1135186040.2120.5.camel@localhost> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Am Mittwoch, den 21.12.2005, 15:53 +0100 schrieb Enrico Pisoni: > > Hi > > yesterday I updated my Fedora Core 3 installed on a single cpu-pc, and > > > it happened a very strange thing... > > > > Now I can login only using "root" account....if I try with simple user > > > account, the system stops on a blue monitor....and nothing > > happens....and nothing can be done.... > > > > But if I log in as a root, I can enter in the shell, change user, > > enter in my home and work normally....but only using shell > > > Did you enable SELinux on reiserfs? > > In another console watch for error messages while trying to login # tail > -f /var/log/messages > > > Thomas > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: This is a digitally signed message part > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051221/4dc05c8 > 2/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:24:02 -0500 > From: Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: OT: Very Strange Knode Issue > To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <v04020a01bfcf368fc268@[192.168.123.162]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > At 9:43 PM -0500 12/20/05, David Cary Hart wrote: > >This is really weird. Anyway, the long and short of it is, if I post to > Usenet > >with Knode it seems to show up on at least some servers but NEVER makes > it to > >Google Groups. > > > >If I make the same post using Sylpheed - with the same settings, it > >shows up. I have tried it direct-to-ISP and with Leafnode. The results > are the > >same either way. I have duplicated this now more than ten times. > > > >Ergo, apparently there is something that Knode is doing to Usenet posts > that > >Google doesn't like. > > > >If there's another Usenet junkie out there, could you see if you can > duplicate > >this issue before I file a bug report that seems this implausible and > makes me > >look even more like a cashew? > > The obvious thing is to look at the headers, espeically for x-no-archive > (sp?). > ____________________________________________________________________ > TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:23:37 -0500 > From: Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora Core 4 Update: caching-nameserver-7.3-4.FC4 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <v04020a02bfcf3d0f4992@[192.168.123.162]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > At 12:24 AM +1030 12/22/05, Tim wrote: > >Tim: > >>> When this, and system-config-bind updated, I found this problem: > >>> > >>> ll /etc/named.conf* > >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Dec 20 16:15 /etc/named.conf -> > >>>/var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf > >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Oct 27 12:36 /etc/named.conf.rpmsave -> > >>>/var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf > >>> > >>> Shouldn't the last one link to "named.conf.rpmsave"? For a moment I > >>> thought I'd lost my customised version of named.conf. Luckily it > was > >>> still there, just not where I expected to find it. > > > >Tony Nelson: > > > >> Well, the .rpmsave files are just made by mv'ing the old file out of > >> the way so it doesn't get clobbered. If a "file" is really a soft > >> link, it will still point to the same path it used to point to, as it > >> hasn't been changed. What you have with the .rpmsave files is a way > >> to compare old and new, and a way to back out of difficulty if you > >> need to, not some parallel working installation. > > > >I know what the RPMSAVE copies are for, I'm not sure if you noticed > what > >I listed. The /etc/named.conf.rpmsave file is really a link to the > >chrooted named.conf file. It doesn't link to the chrooted > >named.conf.rpmsave file. > > Of course I noticed what you listed. Read what I posted, and think > about > it. Look up any words you don't understand. Perhaps "mv" is one of > them. > > > >i.e. I reckon that it should have done things like this (below), not > >like how it actually did it (above). > > > >ll /etc/named.conf* > >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Dec 20 16:15 /etc/named.conf -> > >/var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf > >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Oct 27 12:36 /etc/named.conf.rpmsave -> > >/var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf.rpmsave > > You "reckon" wrong. > > >Notice a slight difference? > > Yes. That difference was, in fact, the point of my post, which you > should > read carefully. Computers are not intelligent, or smart, or able to > guess > what you want for arbitrary data. > > > >If they're going to bother to put symlinks in the /etc/ directory, they > >ought to do so in a logical fashion. > > "They" didn't put any symlinks there, the Packager did. RPM did behave > in > a logical fashion. Your logic is wrong, and you are going to be > fighting > RPM and your computer until you stop disagreeing with it and learn about > symlinks, mv, RPM, and packaging in general. > ____________________________________________________________________ > TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:32:54 -0500 > From: David Cary Hart <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: OT: Very Strange Knode Issue > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <20051221123254.295c849b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:24:02 -0500 > Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> opined: > > At 9:43 PM -0500 12/20/05, David Cary Hart wrote: > > >This is really weird. Anyway, the long and short of it is, if I post > to > > >Usenet with Knode it seems to show up on at least some servers but > NEVER > > >makes it to Google Groups. > > > > > >If I make the same post using Sylpheed - with the same settings, it > > >shows up. I have tried it direct-to-ISP and with Leafnode. The > results are > > >the same either way. I have duplicated this now more than ten times. > > > > > >Ergo, apparently there is something that Knode is doing to Usenet > posts that > > >Google doesn't like. > > > > > >If there's another Usenet junkie out there, could you see if you can > > >duplicate this issue before I file a bug report that seems this > implausible > > >and makes me look even more like a cashew? > > > > The obvious thing is to look at the headers, espeically for > x-no-archive > > Nope. It's unfortunate that so many people use Google for Usenet. I > switched > everything over to Sylpheed-Claws which is a fairly decent news client. > > -- > Our DNSRBL - > Eliminate Spam: http://www.TQMcube.com/spam_trap.php > Multi-RBL Check: http://www.TQMcube.com/rblcheck.php > Zombie Graphs: http://www.TQMcube.com/zombies.php > GeoGraphics: http://www.TQMcube.com/origins.php > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:06:58 +0530 > From: arun shrimali <arunudr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <02cf01c60655$26022760$98c2003d@aa> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 > > Yes, when I copy it on my PC, it opens properly > > Arun Shrimali > M-9414239074 > arunudr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul F. Johnson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:43 PM > Subject: Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I am working with openoffice 2.0. My problem is that I can not open > > > the files at my file server (Microsoft - Small business Server), > where > > > as same files open easily by MS Office. Open office give error like > " > > > XYZ file does not exist", can any body help me how to open the > files > > > on my file server ??? > > > > If you make a local copy of the file, will it open then? > > > > TTFN > > > > Paul > > -- > > main(t,_,a) > char*a;{return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86, > > 0,a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a ):3,main > (-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?main(2, > > _+1,"%s %d > %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de} > > +,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r > :'d*'3,}{w+K > > w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l > q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl] > > '/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' > iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n > > 'wk nw' iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c > ;;{nl'-{} > > rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# > }'+}## > > > (!!/"):t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1 > > ):0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,"!ek;dc > i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l > > ,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);} > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:48:11 +0000 > From: Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Solved - Re: Lack of PHP syntax errors on FC4 > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <200512211748.11854.gary.stainburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Wednesday 21 December 2005 15:30, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > Hi folks. > > > > I know that the php.ini file has been changed for version 5 (as > installed > > on a FC4 server) so that errors don't get dumped to the browser, but > go > > only to the logs. > > > > However, they're not going to the logs, and if I temporarily change > > display_errors = On they don't appear in the browser either. > > > > All I get at the browser is a blank > > '<html><head></head><body></body></html>' document. > > > > Any ideas what else I need to do to get the errors output? > > > > I've googled, but while there's haystacks on error handling there are > no > > needles that are useful. > > > > Gary > > Turned out to be the default entry in php.ini > > error_reporting = E_ALL & E_STRICT > > Changed it to > > error_reporting = E_ALL | E_STRICT > > and all's right with the world. It's logging to both the log file and > the > browser (which I can now turn off again) > > -- > Gary Stainburn > > This email does not contain private or confidential material as it > may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown > and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000 > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:56:34 +0000 > From: Craig McLean <craig@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora Core 4 Update: caching-nameserver-7.3-4.FC4 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <43A99752.8070403@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tim wrote: > [snip FC updating caching nameserver package] > > I wonder if maybe a less vitriolic reply might clear this up? > > > > When this, and system-config-bind updated, I found this problem: > > > > ll /etc/named.conf* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Dec 20 16:15 /etc/named.conf -> > /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Oct 27 12:36 /etc/named.conf.rpmsave -> > /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf > > As expected (and explained), the package manager will "mv" (or in this > case, perhaps "cp") the existing config files out of the way. The manual > pages explain that this just creates a new link which still points to > the old file, since cp/mv will only move/copy the *link* to another link > with a different name, but still the same endpoint. > This is one of the big things to get one's head around in any UNIX-like > system, the difference between a "link" and a "file". They are separate > entities. > > > Shouldn't the last one link to "named.conf.rpmsave"? For a moment I > > thought I'd lost my customised version of named.conf. Luckily it was > > still there, just not where I expected to find it. > > No. mv/cp simply moved/copied the link called "/etc/named.conf" to a new > link called "/etc/named.conf.rpmsave" and left it pointing to the same > location, as documented. This is, perhaps, a shortcoming of the RPM > package manager. Perhaps it should be aware of "link enpoints"? > Ultimately, nothing short of raising a bug will do anything about it, > because it performs as documented. > > I hope this makes sense. It's doing what it's designed to do. Bugzilla > is your friend if you disagree ;-) > > C. > > - -- > Craig McLean http://fukka.co.uk > craig@xxxxxxxxxxx Where the fun never starts > Powered by FreeBSD, and GIN! > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFDqZdSMDDagS2VwJ4RAq6HAKDOhET4M8tzKOcy786bKNF3B2zTuACfZugo > P6HBUeYaYkxJpGVlmVWm1LY= > =yahP > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:46:30 +0000 > From: Jonathan Rawle <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: makewhatis causes FC4 to crash > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <doc4dm$4qg$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On two occasions my system has frozen while running the makewhatis > cron.weekly job. I haven't had any other problems with the machine, the > other cron jobs and any other processor-intensive tasks seem to run > fine. > The cron.daily makewhatis (which just updates with pages modified in the > last 24 hours) also is OK. > > I realise that the cron.weekly job must have run successfully many times > without causing a crash. > > Has anyone else had this problem? > > > -- > http://jonathan.rawle.org/ > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:07:52 +0000 > From: "Paul F. Johnson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1135188473.3343.50.camel@xxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > Hi, > > > Yes, when I copy it on my PC, it opens properly > > Sounds like a permissions problem on the server - or it's just being > silly, detecting a non-MS pile of garbage and refusing to play ball. > > TTFN > > Paul > -- > main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86, > 0,a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a ):3,main (-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?main(2, > _+1,"%s %d > %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de} > +,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r > :'d*'3,}{w+K > w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l > q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl] > '/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' > iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n > 'wk nw' iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c > ;;{nl'-{} > rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# > }'+}## > (!!/"):t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1 > ):0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,"!ek;dc > i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l > ,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);} > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:45:28 +0000 > From: Andy Pieters <mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Desktop specific icon > To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > Message-ID: <200512211845.32591.mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi List > > I am using KDE and was wondering how to add an application icon to a > specific > desktop. Right now when I create an application icon, it shows on *all* > > desktops. > > With kind regards > > Andy > -- > Currently not listening to amaroK > Geek code: www.vlaamse-kern.com/geek > Registered Linux User No 379093 > There are no facts, only interpretations - Fredrich Nietzsche > www.vlaamse-kern.com/sas/ for free php utilities > -- > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: not available > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051221/6340171 > 9/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:41:12 -0700 > From: Paul Lemmons <paul.lemmons@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Firefox 1.5 > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1135190472.1227.3.camel@localhost> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > So, is there a good reason it has not made it to general distribution > yet? I have held off going around YUM with the thought that perhaps > there might be a valid reason it has not made it into the standard > distribution channel. > > On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 14:18 -0500, Tayfun Can wrote: > > > www.nrpms.net has one for FC4 > > > > > > On 12/11/05, John Francis <john.francis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So are we going to see Firefox 1.5 released for FC4? > > > > -- > > Kind regards, > > > > John Francis > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > > > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051221/09281d2 > 1/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:12:21 -0200 > From: Fernando Augusto <fernando.augusto@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: How to add font > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <43A9A915.7060109@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hi Fajar, > > I had exactly the same problem and I solve this way: > > You must copy vga fonts to LTSP enviroment either! > > So, > > Copy vga files in /usr/share/dosemu/Xfonts/ > > vga10x20-cp866.pcf.gz > vga11x19.pcf.gz > vga-cp866.pcf.gz > vga.pcf.gz > > to /opt/ltsp/i386/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc > > Execute this command in same path after copy the files: > # mkfontdir > > Check in file /opt/ltsp/i386/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.dir > exists the follow lines: > > vga-cp866.pcf.gz > -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--17-160-75-75-c-80-ibm-cp866 > vga.pcf.gz -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--17-160-75-75-p-80-ibm-cp437 > vga10x20-cp866.pcf.gz > -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-ibm-cp866 > vga11x19.pcf.gz > -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--19-190-75-75-c-100-ibm-cp437 > > Add this lines above in > /opt/ltsp/i386/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.alias file: > > vga -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--17-160-75-75-p-80-ibm-cp437 > vga11x19 -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--19-190-75-75-c-100-ibm-cp437 > vgacyr -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--17-160-75-75-c-80-ibm-cp866 > vga10x20 -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-ibm-cp866 > vga-ua -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--17-160-75-75-c-80-ibm-cp1125 > vga10x20-ua -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-ibm-cp1125 > > > Sorry my poor english! > > > Fernando. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > * How to add font* > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > * /From/: Fajar Priyanto <fajarpri cbn net id> > * /To/: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com> > * /Subject/: How to add font > * /Date/: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 08:11:29 +0700 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Hi all, > I have this situation. > I setup an LTSP environment with my FC4, and I also I setup dosemu. > The problem is, when LTSP client connect to the server, and try to run > dosemu > in X, it said: > You don't have the Dosemu vga font installed and are running remote X. > You > need to install the vga font on your _local_ Xserver. Look at readme for > > detail. > > Ok, so I uncommented the font section in the X: > $_X_font = "vga" > > But the problem persists: > Error:X: Unable to open font "vga", using builtin X > Error of failed request: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource > denied). > > I have tried xhost +, but no good. > > > How do I installed dosemu fonts in FC4? Dosemu has provide all the font > files > such as fonts.dir, fonts.alias, fonts pcf.gz. > > Thanks. > Fajar > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:21:57 -0500 > From: <lists@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Problem with mutt > To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: > <200512211921.jBLJLvbK027274@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-1 > > Sorry for not quoting the pertinent text but fighting a firewall > blockage at the moment.... > > Any chance that some recursive chmod'ing has been done on your system? > > Doublecheck the permissions and ownership of /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail > > > # ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail > > -rwxr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 774264 May 6 2005 > /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail > > To fix you can do: > > chown root:smmsp /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail > chmod 2755 /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail > > HTH, > > --Rob > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 196 > ******************************************** >
