Hi Fedora gurus, I have installed Fedora core 4 on one of my machines and all seems well except when I begin an update. On every package that I select I receive an error message that say that there is not a GPG signature associated with it. Even though they all install and work fine it is a real annoyance. Does anybody have any idea about how to resolve this? Cheers Stan -----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 11:22 AM To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 196 Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: net-snmp-perl not the same as Net::SNMP? (Paul Howarth) 2. problem with openoffice, any OO expert (arun shrimali) 3. Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert (Paul F. Johnson) 4. Re: problem with user log in (Thomas Springer) 5. Re: OT: Very Strange Knode Issue (Tony Nelson) 6. Re: Fedora Core 4 Update: caching-nameserver-7.3-4.FC4 (Tony Nelson) 7. Re: OT: Very Strange Knode Issue (David Cary Hart) 8. Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert (arun shrimali) 9. Solved - Re: Lack of PHP syntax errors on FC4 (Gary Stainburn) 10. Re: Fedora Core 4 Update: caching-nameserver-7.3-4.FC4 (Craig McLean) 11. makewhatis causes FC4 to crash (Jonathan Rawle) 12. Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert (Paul F. Johnson) 13. Desktop specific icon (Andy Pieters) 14. Re: Firefox 1.5 (Paul Lemmons) 15. Re: How to add font (Fernando Augusto) 16. Re: Problem with mutt (lists@xxxxxxxxx) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:05:07 +0000 From: Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: net-snmp-perl not the same as Net::SNMP? To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <43A98B43.4050208@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Mike McGrath wrote: > Can anyone shed some light on net-snmp-perl vs Net::SNMP? I've got a > program that uses Net::SNMP. I've installed net-snmp-perl. I can see > that there is an SNMP.pm on my system, yet when I run the script it > bombs at "use Net::SNMP" > > Can't locate Net/SNMP.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > nagios-plugins/libexec > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3 > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3 > /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl > /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi > /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.6 .) at ./check_ifoperstatus line 41. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./check_ifoperstatus line 41. > > I'd like to avoid using CPAN to install the modules (as I'm trying to > package this for Fedora-Extras). I've seen some posts on this as it > related to FC2 but nothing relating to FC3 or FC4. Any ideas? net-snmp-perl and Net::SNMP are two different things. net-snmp-perl is the perl bindings for the snmp library at http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/, which provides an SNMP.pm without the Net:: prefix. Net::SNMP is a perl module from http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-SNMP/ which provides Net::SNMP (i.e. it would be /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/Net/SNMP.pm). You can find RPMs for this package in Dag's repo: http://dag.wieers.com/packages/perl-Net-SNMP/ Paul. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 22:25:36 +0530 From: arun shrimali <arunudr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: problem with openoffice, any OO expert To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <02a401c60652$410b91c0$98c2003d@aa> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Dear All I am working with openoffice 2.0. My problem is that I can not open the files at my file server (Microsoft - Small business Server), where as same files open easily by MS Office. Open office give error like " XYZ file does not exist", can any body help me how to open the files on my file server ??? Arun Shrimali -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051221/1083e2e 2/attachment.html ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:13:48 +0000 From: "Paul F. Johnson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1135185228.3343.44.camel@xxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain Hi, > > I am working with openoffice 2.0. My problem is that I can not open > the files at my file server (Microsoft - Small business Server), where > as same files open easily by MS Office. Open office give error like " > XYZ file does not exist", can any body help me how to open the files > on my file server ??? If you make a local copy of the file, will it open then? TTFN Paul -- main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86, 0,a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a ):3,main (-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?main(2, _+1,"%s %d %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de} +,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r +:'d*'3,}{w+K w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl] '/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n 'wk nw' iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c ;;{nl'-{} rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# }'+}## (!!/"):t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1 ):0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,"!ek;dc i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l ,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);} ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:27:20 +0100 From: Thomas Springer <th.springer@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: problem with user log in To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1135186040.2120.5.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Mittwoch, den 21.12.2005, 15:53 +0100 schrieb Enrico Pisoni: > Hi > yesterday I updated my Fedora Core 3 installed on a single cpu-pc, and > it happened a very strange thing... > > Now I can login only using "root" account....if I try with simple user > account, the system stops on a blue monitor....and nothing > happens....and nothing can be done.... > > But if I log in as a root, I can enter in the shell, change user, > enter in my home and work normally....but only using shell > Did you enable SELinux on reiserfs? In another console watch for error messages while trying to login # tail -f /var/log/messages Thomas -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051221/4dc05c8 2/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:24:02 -0500 From: Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: OT: Very Strange Knode Issue To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <v04020a01bfcf368fc268@[192.168.123.162]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 9:43 PM -0500 12/20/05, David Cary Hart wrote: >This is really weird. Anyway, the long and short of it is, if I post to Usenet >with Knode it seems to show up on at least some servers but NEVER makes it to >Google Groups. > >If I make the same post using Sylpheed - with the same settings, it >shows up. I have tried it direct-to-ISP and with Leafnode. The results are the >same either way. I have duplicated this now more than ten times. > >Ergo, apparently there is something that Knode is doing to Usenet posts that >Google doesn't like. > >If there's another Usenet junkie out there, could you see if you can duplicate >this issue before I file a bug report that seems this implausible and makes me >look even more like a cashew? The obvious thing is to look at the headers, espeically for x-no-archive (sp?). ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:23:37 -0500 From: Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Fedora Core 4 Update: caching-nameserver-7.3-4.FC4 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <v04020a02bfcf3d0f4992@[192.168.123.162]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 12:24 AM +1030 12/22/05, Tim wrote: >Tim: >>> When this, and system-config-bind updated, I found this problem: >>> >>> ll /etc/named.conf* >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Dec 20 16:15 /etc/named.conf -> >>>/var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Oct 27 12:36 /etc/named.conf.rpmsave -> >>>/var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf >>> >>> Shouldn't the last one link to "named.conf.rpmsave"? For a moment I >>> thought I'd lost my customised version of named.conf. Luckily it was >>> still there, just not where I expected to find it. > >Tony Nelson: > >> Well, the .rpmsave files are just made by mv'ing the old file out of >> the way so it doesn't get clobbered. If a "file" is really a soft >> link, it will still point to the same path it used to point to, as it >> hasn't been changed. What you have with the .rpmsave files is a way >> to compare old and new, and a way to back out of difficulty if you >> need to, not some parallel working installation. > >I know what the RPMSAVE copies are for, I'm not sure if you noticed what >I listed. The /etc/named.conf.rpmsave file is really a link to the >chrooted named.conf file. It doesn't link to the chrooted >named.conf.rpmsave file. Of course I noticed what you listed. Read what I posted, and think about it. Look up any words you don't understand. Perhaps "mv" is one of them. >i.e. I reckon that it should have done things like this (below), not >like how it actually did it (above). > >ll /etc/named.conf* >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Dec 20 16:15 /etc/named.conf -> >/var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf >lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Oct 27 12:36 /etc/named.conf.rpmsave -> >/var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf.rpmsave You "reckon" wrong. >Notice a slight difference? Yes. That difference was, in fact, the point of my post, which you should read carefully. Computers are not intelligent, or smart, or able to guess what you want for arbitrary data. >If they're going to bother to put symlinks in the /etc/ directory, they >ought to do so in a logical fashion. "They" didn't put any symlinks there, the Packager did. RPM did behave in a logical fashion. Your logic is wrong, and you are going to be fighting RPM and your computer until you stop disagreeing with it and learn about symlinks, mv, RPM, and packaging in general. ____________________________________________________________________ TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/> ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:32:54 -0500 From: David Cary Hart <Fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: OT: Very Strange Knode Issue To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20051221123254.295c849b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:24:02 -0500 Tony Nelson <tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> opined: > At 9:43 PM -0500 12/20/05, David Cary Hart wrote: > >This is really weird. Anyway, the long and short of it is, if I post to > >Usenet with Knode it seems to show up on at least some servers but NEVER > >makes it to Google Groups. > > > >If I make the same post using Sylpheed - with the same settings, it > >shows up. I have tried it direct-to-ISP and with Leafnode. The results are > >the same either way. I have duplicated this now more than ten times. > > > >Ergo, apparently there is something that Knode is doing to Usenet posts that > >Google doesn't like. > > > >If there's another Usenet junkie out there, could you see if you can > >duplicate this issue before I file a bug report that seems this implausible > >and makes me look even more like a cashew? > > The obvious thing is to look at the headers, espeically for x-no-archive Nope. It's unfortunate that so many people use Google for Usenet. I switched everything over to Sylpheed-Claws which is a fairly decent news client. -- Our DNSRBL - Eliminate Spam: http://www.TQMcube.com/spam_trap.php Multi-RBL Check: http://www.TQMcube.com/rblcheck.php Zombie Graphs: http://www.TQMcube.com/zombies.php GeoGraphics: http://www.TQMcube.com/origins.php ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:06:58 +0530 From: arun shrimali <arunudr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <02cf01c60655$26022760$98c2003d@aa> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Yes, when I copy it on my PC, it opens properly Arun Shrimali M-9414239074 arunudr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul F. Johnson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 10:43 PM Subject: Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert > Hi, > > > > > I am working with openoffice 2.0. My problem is that I can not open > > the files at my file server (Microsoft - Small business Server), where > > as same files open easily by MS Office. Open office give error like " > > XYZ file does not exist", can any body help me how to open the files > > on my file server ??? > > If you make a local copy of the file, will it open then? > > TTFN > > Paul > -- > main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86, > 0,a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a ):3,main (-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?main(2, > _+1,"%s %d %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de} > +,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K > w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl] > '/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n > 'wk nw' iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c ;;{nl'-{} > rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# }'+}## > (!!/"):t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1 > ):0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,"!ek;dc i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l > ,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);} > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:48:11 +0000 From: Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Solved - Re: Lack of PHP syntax errors on FC4 To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <200512211748.11854.gary.stainburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On Wednesday 21 December 2005 15:30, Gary Stainburn wrote: > Hi folks. > > I know that the php.ini file has been changed for version 5 (as installed > on a FC4 server) so that errors don't get dumped to the browser, but go > only to the logs. > > However, they're not going to the logs, and if I temporarily change > display_errors = On they don't appear in the browser either. > > All I get at the browser is a blank > '<html><head></head><body></body></html>' document. > > Any ideas what else I need to do to get the errors output? > > I've googled, but while there's haystacks on error handling there are no > needles that are useful. > > Gary Turned out to be the default entry in php.ini error_reporting = E_ALL & E_STRICT Changed it to error_reporting = E_ALL | E_STRICT and all's right with the world. It's logging to both the log file and the browser (which I can now turn off again) -- Gary Stainburn This email does not contain private or confidential material as it may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000 ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:56:34 +0000 From: Craig McLean <craig@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Fedora Core 4 Update: caching-nameserver-7.3-4.FC4 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <43A99752.8070403@xxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tim wrote: [snip FC updating caching nameserver package] I wonder if maybe a less vitriolic reply might clear this up? > > When this, and system-config-bind updated, I found this problem: > > ll /etc/named.conf* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Dec 20 16:15 /etc/named.conf -> /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Oct 27 12:36 /etc/named.conf.rpmsave -> /var/named/chroot/etc/named.conf As expected (and explained), the package manager will "mv" (or in this case, perhaps "cp") the existing config files out of the way. The manual pages explain that this just creates a new link which still points to the old file, since cp/mv will only move/copy the *link* to another link with a different name, but still the same endpoint. This is one of the big things to get one's head around in any UNIX-like system, the difference between a "link" and a "file". They are separate entities. > Shouldn't the last one link to "named.conf.rpmsave"? For a moment I > thought I'd lost my customised version of named.conf. Luckily it was > still there, just not where I expected to find it. No. mv/cp simply moved/copied the link called "/etc/named.conf" to a new link called "/etc/named.conf.rpmsave" and left it pointing to the same location, as documented. This is, perhaps, a shortcoming of the RPM package manager. Perhaps it should be aware of "link enpoints"? Ultimately, nothing short of raising a bug will do anything about it, because it performs as documented. I hope this makes sense. It's doing what it's designed to do. Bugzilla is your friend if you disagree ;-) C. - -- Craig McLean http://fukka.co.uk craig@xxxxxxxxxxx Where the fun never starts Powered by FreeBSD, and GIN! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDqZdSMDDagS2VwJ4RAq6HAKDOhET4M8tzKOcy786bKNF3B2zTuACfZugo P6HBUeYaYkxJpGVlmVWm1LY= =yahP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:46:30 +0000 From: Jonathan Rawle <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: makewhatis causes FC4 to crash To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <doc4dm$4qg$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On two occasions my system has frozen while running the makewhatis cron.weekly job. I haven't had any other problems with the machine, the other cron jobs and any other processor-intensive tasks seem to run fine. The cron.daily makewhatis (which just updates with pages modified in the last 24 hours) also is OK. I realise that the cron.weekly job must have run successfully many times without causing a crash. Has anyone else had this problem? -- http://jonathan.rawle.org/ ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:07:52 +0000 From: "Paul F. Johnson" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: problem with openoffice, any OO expert To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1135188473.3343.50.camel@xxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain Hi, > Yes, when I copy it on my PC, it opens properly Sounds like a permissions problem on the server - or it's just being silly, detecting a non-MS pile of garbage and refusing to play ball. TTFN Paul -- main(t,_,a) char*a;{return!0<t?t<3?main(-79,-13,a+main(-87,1-_,main(-86, 0,a+1 )+a)):1,t<_?main(t+1,_,a ):3,main (-94,-27+t,a)&&t==2?_<13?main(2, _+1,"%s %d %d\n"):9:16:t<0?t<-72?main(_,t,"@n'+,#'/*{}w+/w#cdnr/+,{}r/*de} +,/*{*+,/w{%+,/w#q#n+,/#{l,+,/n{n+,/+#n+,/#;#q#n+,/+k#;*+,/'r :'d*'3,}{w+K w'K:'+}e#';dq#'l q#'+d'K#!/+k#;q#'r}eKK#}w'r}eKK{nl]'/#;#q#n'){)#}w'){){nl] '/+#n';d}rw' i;# ){nl]!/n{n#'; r{#w'r nc{nl]'/#{l,+'K {rw' iK{;[{nl]'/w#q#n 'wk nw' iwk{KK{nl]!/w{%'l##w#' i; :{nl]'/*{q#'ld;r'}{nlwb!/*de}'c ;;{nl'-{} rw]'/+,}##'*}#nc,',#nw]'/+kd'+e}+;#'rdq#w! nr'/ ') }+}{rl#'{n' ')# }'+}## (!!/"):t<-50?_==*a?putchar(31[a]):main(-65,_,a+1):main((*a=='/')+t,_,a+1 ):0<t?main(2,2,"%s"):*a=='/'||main(0,main(-61,*a,"!ek;dc i@bK'(q)-[w]*%n+r3#l ,{}:\nuwloca-O;m .vpbks,fxntdCeghiry"),a+1);} ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:45:28 +0000 From: Andy Pieters <mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Desktop specific icon To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <200512211845.32591.mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi List I am using KDE and was wondering how to add an application icon to a specific desktop. Right now when I create an application icon, it shows on *all* desktops. With kind regards Andy -- Currently not listening to amaroK Geek code: www.vlaamse-kern.com/geek Registered Linux User No 379093 There are no facts, only interpretations - Fredrich Nietzsche www.vlaamse-kern.com/sas/ for free php utilities -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051221/6340171 9/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:41:12 -0700 From: Paul Lemmons <paul.lemmons@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Firefox 1.5 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1135190472.1227.3.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" So, is there a good reason it has not made it to general distribution yet? I have held off going around YUM with the thought that perhaps there might be a valid reason it has not made it into the standard distribution channel. On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 14:18 -0500, Tayfun Can wrote: > www.nrpms.net has one for FC4 > > > On 12/11/05, John Francis <john.francis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So are we going to see Firefox 1.5 released for FC4? > > -- > Kind regards, > > John Francis > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051221/09281d2 1/attachment.html ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:12:21 -0200 From: Fernando Augusto <fernando.augusto@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: How to add font To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <43A9A915.7060109@xxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hi Fajar, I had exactly the same problem and I solve this way: You must copy vga fonts to LTSP enviroment either! So, Copy vga files in /usr/share/dosemu/Xfonts/ vga10x20-cp866.pcf.gz vga11x19.pcf.gz vga-cp866.pcf.gz vga.pcf.gz to /opt/ltsp/i386/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc Execute this command in same path after copy the files: # mkfontdir Check in file /opt/ltsp/i386/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.dir exists the follow lines: vga-cp866.pcf.gz -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--17-160-75-75-c-80-ibm-cp866 vga.pcf.gz -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--17-160-75-75-p-80-ibm-cp437 vga10x20-cp866.pcf.gz -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-ibm-cp866 vga11x19.pcf.gz -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--19-190-75-75-c-100-ibm-cp437 Add this lines above in /opt/ltsp/i386/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.alias file: vga -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--17-160-75-75-p-80-ibm-cp437 vga11x19 -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--19-190-75-75-c-100-ibm-cp437 vgacyr -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--17-160-75-75-c-80-ibm-cp866 vga10x20 -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-ibm-cp866 vga-ua -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--17-160-75-75-c-80-ibm-cp1125 vga10x20-ua -dosemu-vga-medium-r-normal--20-200-75-75-c-100-ibm-cp1125 Sorry my poor english! Fernando. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * How to add font* ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * /From/: Fajar Priyanto <fajarpri cbn net id> * /To/: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com> * /Subject/: How to add font * /Date/: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 08:11:29 +0700 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hi all, I have this situation. I setup an LTSP environment with my FC4, and I also I setup dosemu. The problem is, when LTSP client connect to the server, and try to run dosemu in X, it said: You don't have the Dosemu vga font installed and are running remote X. You need to install the vga font on your _local_ Xserver. Look at readme for detail. Ok, so I uncommented the font section in the X: $_X_font = "vga" But the problem persists: Error:X: Unable to open font "vga", using builtin X Error of failed request: BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied). I have tried xhost +, but no good. How do I installed dosemu fonts in FC4? Dosemu has provide all the font files such as fonts.dir, fonts.alias, fonts pcf.gz. Thanks. Fajar ------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:21:57 -0500 From: <lists@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Problem with mutt To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <200512211921.jBLJLvbK027274@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-1 Sorry for not quoting the pertinent text but fighting a firewall blockage at the moment.... Any chance that some recursive chmod'ing has been done on your system? Doublecheck the permissions and ownership of /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail > # ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail > -rwxr-sr-x 1 root smmsp 774264 May 6 2005 /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail To fix you can do: chown root:smmsp /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail chmod 2755 /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail HTH, --Rob ------------------------------ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 196 ********************************************
