I suggested:
> Try "ping google.com" for several hours, and see how many packets you
> drop.
Tim wrote:
> I hope you don't mean continuously. That would constitute abuse.
That's a fairly harsh definition of abuse you've got.
They've made the ping service available in the same way as they make the
HTTP service available. Accessing Google's web pages once a second would
not be OTT for a suitably busy site.
Continuous pinging *is* necessary occasionally as a form of network
diagnostic: it tells the network administrator whether (and in
conjunction with traceroute, where) to complain about network timeouts.
I selected Google partly because of the size and capacity of their
servers and network connections.
I don't think I'm abusing Google. I'm using the facilities they make
available in the way they're supposed to be used. And I'm not taking
anywhere *near* unreasonably large amounts of resources to do so.
So why do you think it's abuse?
James.
--
E-mail address: james | In the Royal Air Force a landing's OK,
@westexe.demon.co.uk | If the pilot gets out and can still walk away.
| But in the Fleet Air Arm the outlook is grim,
| If your landings are duff and you've not learnt to
| swim.
