Re: Logwatch question

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Logwatch question
• From: Andy Pieters <mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:57:03 +0100
• In-reply-to: <200511241455.13008.claude_jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• Organization: Straight-A-Software
• References: <200511242041.58749.mailings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200511241455.13008.claude_jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.8.2

On Thursday 24 November 2005 20:55, Claude Jones wrote:
> Works well...this is assuming you're running the latest version of
> Logwatch, which changed things.

[root@ramses andy]# rpm -q logwatch
logwatch-6.1.2-2

Would this be sufficient?


With kind regards


Andy

-- 
Now listening to Top! Radio Live www.topradio.be/stream on amaroK
Geek code: www.vlaamse-kern.com/geek
Registered Linux User No 379093
If life was for sale, what would be its price?
www.vlaamse-kern.com/sas/ for free php utilities
--

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Logwatch question
    • From: Claude Jones

• References:
  • Logwatch question
    • From: Andy Pieters
  • Re: Logwatch question
    • From: Claude Jones

• Prev by Date: Re: Logwatch question
• Next by Date: Re: Logwatch question
• Previous by thread: Re: Logwatch question
• Next by thread: Re: Logwatch question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread