> On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 13:38 +0100, Roger Grosswiler wrote: >> > I've gotten a ton of viruses today - there seems to be a worm lose >> > again. >> > >> > I've come to the realization that I have never ever received a zip >> > attachment from someone not in my address book that I actually wanted, >> > so I would like to set a spam assassin rule to mark mail with a .zip >> > or .exe with a high spam score (my address book is white listed) >> > >> > Anyone know how to do this off hand? >> > >> > Another possibility would be a procmail rule - I use procmail to >> filter >> > my mail - but since spamassassin already knows about my whitelist, I'd >> > rather do it in spamassassin. >> > >> i did this in postfix: >> >> i added in /etc/postfix/ a file called mime_headers_check with this >> content: > > That wouldn't really work for me for two reasons - > > 1) I don't want to reject them, the fm header is usually forged - so > rejecting just sends them to someone else who more than likely did not > send it to me. > > 2) My postfix is only allowed to talk on my lan - I use fetchmail to pop > my accounts (which processes them with spamassassin), procmail to filter > them into my mailboxes (which is then served via imap to my clients). > postfix is used for some stuff, but only on the lan - it can't send to > outside world. To get to outside world, I use my mail account providers > smtp server. > > I'm sure there is a spamassassin way to give a high score based upon > attachment extensions - I'll see if I can find it. > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > 2 things: 1) in my opinion, procmail listens to mta such as sendmail or postfix. Using fetchmail in my opinion delivers to mtas like the same. so, an incoming e-mail should also pass by your postfix-server? or am i wrong here? 2) IMHO you can replace REJECT by DISCARD see here: http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html greetings, Roger
