On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 14:45 -0500, David A. De Graaf wrote: > For those of us with hands glued to the standard typing position, > the inability of firefox to scroll vi-style is a constant irritation. > The necessity to lift the hand over to the unnatural arrow keys, My arrow keys seem quite natural. Up arrow points up and moves up; the down arrow's below it and moves down; left arrow is left of it, and points left; there's a right arrow on the right that goes right, etc. > Why can't firefox obey the standard convention? But *which* standard??? > - move down with the right index finger, up with the middle finger, > left by reaching left, and right with the third finger? Scroll up a > full page by reaching up to u, and down with the thumb. Oh right, one with out any coherent correlation between the keycaps and the functionality. Much as it grieves me to say it, there's a lot of logic in some of the other OSs key combinations: A qualifier and O to open files, a qualifier and S to save a file, arrow keys, etc. Linux, on the other hand, uses a plethora of illogical and different key combinations. Heck, I can't even cut and paste between some things, at all, even when I've figured out what peculiar key combinations individual applications use. I can see why Firefox, by default, uses logical key combinations, and doesn't use unnatural vi-specific keybindings. ;-| -- Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists.
