RE: Intel 815 Video Chipset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The machine is fully updated. The Option "noaccel" didn't make any
difference and I have removed it from the config file again.

Craig 

-----Original Message-----
From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Cornette
Sent: Monday, 14 November 2005 10:07 PM
To: For users of Fedora Core releases
Subject: Re: Intel 815 Video Chipset

Craig Preston wrote:

>I think I spoke to soon. It only seems to work properly at lower 
>resolutions. However the higher resolutions work fine under windows, so

>I know the card can support them.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Craig Preston
>Sent: Monday, 14 November 2005 3:15 PM
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases
>Subject: RE: Intel 815 Video Chipset
>
>Changed my monitor settings and it now seems to be OK. It was detected 
>as a generic monitor, but I chaged it to the actual model.
>
>thanks
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bill Perkins
>Sent: Monday, 14 November 2005 2:52 PM
>To: For users of Fedora Core releases
>Subject: Re: Intel 815 Video Chipset
>
>Craig Preston wrote:
>  
>
>>I have just installed FC4 on a Dell GX150 that has an onboard Intel
>>815 chipset. X does work, however there are all vertical lines that 
>>flicker and it seems to be a lot jerkier than it should.
>>
>>I found on some forums to add the Option = "noaccel" to the device 
>>section of the xorg.conf file, however this hasn't fixed it. Has 
>>anyone else seen or fixed this problem?
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Craig
>>
>>    
>>
>
>I have an 815 chipset, and I've seen the symptoms you describe. I had 
>to tweak the xorg.conf file to get it to work right- make sure the 
>configuration program didn't put some insane values in the video 
>section.
>
>--
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-
>-------
>"The two most common things in the	| Bill Perkins
>  universe are Hydrogen and Stupidity."	| perk@xxxxxxx
>					| programmer-at-large
>		F. Zappa		| ALL assembly languages done
>here.
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>-
>-------
>
>--
>fedora-list mailing list
>fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>--
>fedora-list mailing list
>fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>  
>
If you are fully updated to the latest rpms for FC4, X should be fairly
decent. I run FC4 on a computer with 1280x1024 resolution. I use 24
depth which works great for 2-D applications.  The Option "NoAccel" 
option was needed for a refresh problem with the driver awhile back. 
(FC3 era, I believe). You will probably do better without having
"NoAccel" added to xorg.conf

Jim

--
If Windows sucked it would be good for something.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux