On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 17:39 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote: > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > Being a law abiding citizen, I shell, pending sleep deprivation and bad > > hair days, switch to bottom posting, even though I find it a-severe-'we- > > are-mutt-using-hackers-that-do-everything-up-side-down-just-because-we- > > can'-pain-in-my-back-side. > > > > Thanks for enlightening me, > > Now-bottom-posting-Gilboa. > > To be fair, bottom-posting is in many cases just as bad as top-posting, > i.e. when the poster does not trim irrelevent material, such as anything > below the last line of a reply. Thank you for taking notice of the local > netiquette though. > > Paul. > I fully agree. Here's a nice example on why I hate bottom-posting. (And again, I accept the local netiquette and shall bottom-post pigs till grow wings and fly...) >>> First >>> Let >>> me >>> say >>> that >>> bottom >>> posting >>> can >>> be >>> as >>> annoying >>> as >>> top >>> posting >> >> why ? >> do >> you >> say >> that? >> > because > you > just > sifted > through > 50 > lines > of > useless > junk > just > to > see > this > line: Oh... OK :) /Me hiding, waiting for the big bang to come... Gilboa
