On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 13:31 -0500, Derek Martin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:42:12PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > I certainly dont expect you to read every link or response posted in > > this list. I agree that noone would have time for that generally but if > > you want to respond to something I have said, I would have expect you to > > read and understand what I have told. I would consider that a very fair > > expectation. Agreed? > > Yes, and no. Your post suggested that the OP get involved, as if he > wasn't getting involved already by participating here. I do apologize > for responding without full knowledge, but at the same time, given the > context, I don't think it was unreasonable to assume that you were > suggesting he write code without bothering to look at the link. It's > something that one hears too often from programmers on mailing lists > like this one, and again, I think sending that link is saying that > you think he's not already involved by participating here. Hence the > assumption. Sorry. I saw Rahul's comment as an invitation to do more than just vent in generalities. The link he provided is an invitation to get involved in specifics and a chance to really make a difference without having your voice buried in the mass of noise on this list. This list is good for quick responses and general questions as well as a lot of (sometimes opinionated) discussion. But as this thread shows, it quickly takes a turn away from the original subject and often has no further bearing on the original topic. Participating in ways listed in that link are not subject to the diversions seen here and thus are more focused and more productive. I think that someone with as strong an opinion as the OP would be of use in influencing development in ways he feels beneficial. Others may feel the same way and it works to influence the system to work "your way". > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
