on 10/29/2005 10:51 AM Andy Pieters wrote: > Hi > > While I admit packages are better to maintain, there is some truth in the > words of Michial Peters. > > A bug should be filed. Bug does not necessarly mean "defect" but can also > mean "missing". And in this case the package amaroK without MySql is > certainly missing. strongly agree. I miss it very much > > When compiling (...) it is as easy as configure --without-mysql but if > packaged then the packager should make a package with MySQL and WITHOUT > MySQL, even more so that MySQL support for amaroK is new (not taling about > Beta versions) exactly! > > With kind regards > > > Andy > > On Saturday 29 October 2005 16:16, Rex Dieter wrote: > >>Michael Peters wrote: >> >>>The MySQL dependency sounds to me like a packaging mistake, a bug should >>>be filed IMHO. >> >>Nope, just that amarok is built with support for a mysql backend, and >>that support requires mysql. (And, AFAIK unfortunately, there's no easy >>way to separate it out for those who don't want it). >> >>-- Rex > > -- regards, Oleksandr Korneta
