Hi While I admit packages are better to maintain, there is some truth in the words of Michial Peters. A bug should be filed. Bug does not necessarly mean "defect" but can also mean "missing". And in this case the package amaroK without MySql is certainly missing. When compiling (...) it is as easy as configure --without-mysql but if packaged then the packager should make a package with MySQL and WITHOUT MySQL, even more so that MySQL support for amaroK is new (not taling about Beta versions) With kind regards Andy On Saturday 29 October 2005 16:16, Rex Dieter wrote: > Michael Peters wrote: > > The MySQL dependency sounds to me like a packaging mistake, a bug should > > be filed IMHO. > > Nope, just that amarok is built with support for a mysql backend, and > that support requires mysql. (And, AFAIK unfortunately, there's no easy > way to separate it out for those who don't want it). > > -- Rex -- Now listening to Top! Radio Live www.topradio.be/stream on amaroK Geek code: www.vlaamse-kern.com/geek Registered Linux User No 379093 If life was for sale, what would be its price? www.vlaamse-kern.com/sas/ for free php utilities --
Attachment:
pgpDkQ6hxkKpq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
