Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
• From: Naoki <naoki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:32:50 +0900
• In-reply-to: <20051025085318.GO29766@xxxxxxxxxx>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• Organization: ValueCommerce
• References: <1129700956.2886.169.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051019094117.GG928@xxxxxxxxxx> <43564D9B.6000608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4fa5e2e40510190705s7e594a65iae7e134873f0fb27@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051019143344.GH928@xxxxxxxxxx> <1129782647.2886.248.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1129863534.27643.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051021154047.GE29766@xxxxxxxxxx> <1130214854.31063.176.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1130217982.31063.186.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051025085318.GO29766@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Ah, got it. Ok done, and I've updated the bugzilla entry.


> No, wrong move.  :-(
> 
> Rawhide *already* had this fix.  Please test the FC4 test update so
> that I can release the final update.

• References:
  • cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Naoki
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Tim Waugh
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Naoki
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Oliver Leitner
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Tim Waugh
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Naoki
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Naoki
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Tim Waugh
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Naoki
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Naoki
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Tim Waugh

• Prev by Date: Re: the proper way to 'yum update' a new 'everything' install of FC4?
• Next by Date: Re: LVM Resize Revisited
• Previous by thread: Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
• Next by thread: Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread