Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
• From: Naoki <naoki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:30:47 +0900
• In-reply-to: <20051019143344.GH928@xxxxxxxxxx>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• Organization: ValueCommerce
• References: <1129700956.2886.169.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051019094117.GG928@xxxxxxxxxx> <43564D9B.6000608@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4fa5e2e40510190705s7e594a65iae7e134873f0fb27@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20051019143344.GH928@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Ok Tim thanks. I'll open a new one.

Cheers,

On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 15:33 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote:
> Please re-open or, if you can't do that, file a separate bug report.
> The original bug report was against a Fedora devel package, and I did
> not realise that FC4 was affected until you mentioned it.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Naoki

• References:
  • cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Naoki
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Tim Waugh
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Naoki
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Oliver Leitner
  • Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
    • From: Tim Waugh

• Prev by Date: RPM Database broken
• Next by Date: Fedora Core 3
• Previous by thread: Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
• Next by thread: Re: cups failure due to ghostscript segfault.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread