I'm using FC4 with spamassassin-3.0.4-1.fc4. fetchmail delivers mail to a locally running postfix. spamd is running as a service, and spamc is called by procmail on my mail. My setup is almost identical to that desribed here: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsedViaProcmail However, despite the fact that I have trained spamassassin on a vast amount of both ham and spam using sa-learn, I suspect that Bayesian testing is not being applied. I became suspicious that this might be the case after receiving over a dozen almost identical messages and despite training spamassassin on them they are still not being identified as spam. So I started looking at the headers that spamassassin adds to each message more closely. Here is the header it added to a recent message from this list: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=failed version=3.0.4 And here is an example of an incorrectly identified spam message: X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR, RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=no version=3.0.4 Now according to this: http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_0_x.html in the "tests" part of those headers I ought to see one of: BAYES_00 BAYES_05 BAYES_20 BAYES_40 BAYES_50 BAYES_60 BAYES_80 BAYES_95 BAYES_99 Am I just getting confused or is Bayesian checking not happening? Best, Darren -- ===================================================================== D. D. Brierton darren@xxxxxxxxxxx www.dzr-web.com Trying is the first step towards failure (Homer Simpson) =====================================================================
