On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 23:34 +0930, Tim wrote: > Surely becoming a mirror would mean some sort of registration process, > with a corresponding checkback that the mirror remains reasonably > current and uncompromised? Exactly. luke
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 23:34 +0930, Tim wrote: > Surely becoming a mirror would mean some sort of registration process, > with a corresponding checkback that the mirror remains reasonably > current and uncompromised? Exactly. luke