On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 15:30, David Hollis wrote: > > > > > 2. A Maildir setup would likely put each users folders in their home > > > directories making it extremely difficult to backup the mail itself > > > whereas something like cyrus-imapd has it's own mail store which can be > > > put onto it's own partition and could simply be dumped. > > > > If you are going to the trouble of providing redundancy, I'd think > > you'd want to back up all of the user's data, not just email, so > > having it all in the same place becomes an advantage for maildirs. > > Also, the cyrus database format may have some internal dependencies > > that will break if you copy it without shutting down. The maildir > > format was designed so the messages were self-contained and do > > not need multiple operations to be atomic. Dovecot tries to keep > > an index which will most likely be wrong if copied when the user > > is active, but it will rebuild it if it becomes inconsistent. > > > > Yeah, the dovecot index stuff I'm hoping really isn't an issue. > Hopefully it picks up that things it's out-of-whack and updates itself. > As for user data, there isn't any on this system, it's just mail so I > only need to replicate the mail partition contents and the LDAP > directory part. LDAP will use OpenLDAPs replication of course so that > part isn't an issue. If you really need down-to-the second replication you might look at the raid-over-network options - drbd or raid over enbd devices. But a 'warm' backup server kept up to date with frequent rsyncs is going to be a lot better than most other ways you would handle backup/restore and server crashes. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx