Re: 2.6.9 kernelv vs. 2.6.10 and 2.6.11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2.6.9 kernelv vs. 2.6.10 and 2.6.11
From: Gilboa Davara <gilboada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:55:30 +0300
In-reply-to: <14CFC56C96D8554AA0B8969DB825FEA09700A2@chicken.machinevisionproducts.com>
List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <14CFC56C96D8554AA0B8969DB825FEA09700A2@chicken.machinevisionproducts.com>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

remap_page_range was replaced with remap_pfn_range.

Gilboa

On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 07:44 -0700, Brian D. McGrew wrote:

Good morning ...

We have some device drivers that use the remap_page_range call in the
2.6.9 kernel.  We're trying to move forward to 2.6.10 and see it's
deprecated and completely gone from 2.6.11.

Anyone know what the replacement is for this call?

Thanks!

-brian
 
Brian D. McGrew { brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx || brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx }
---
> Those of you who think you know it all,
  really annoy those of us who do!

References:
- 2.6.9 kernelv vs. 2.6.10 and 2.6.11
  - From: Brian D. McGrew

Prev by Date: [FC4] Fail to launch realplay
Next by Date: Re: xntpd sendto (possible hack?)
Previous by thread: 2.6.9 kernelv vs. 2.6.10 and 2.6.11
Next by thread: [FC4] Fail to launch realplay
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]