2.6.9 kernelv vs. 2.6.10 and 2.6.11

• To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: 2.6.9 kernelv vs. 2.6.10 and 2.6.11
• From: "Brian D. McGrew" <brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 07:44:24 -0700
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Thread-index: AcW0g84sVaSP7O/5TCKPJDiQxrmFow==
• Thread-topic: 2.6.9 kernelv vs. 2.6.10 and 2.6.11

Good morning ...

We have some device drivers that use the remap_page_range call in the
2.6.9 kernel.  We're trying to move forward to 2.6.10 and see it's
deprecated and completely gone from 2.6.11.

Anyone know what the replacement is for this call?

Thanks!

-brian
 
Brian D. McGrew { brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx || brian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx }
---
> Those of you who think you know it all,
  really annoy those of us who do!

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2.6.9 kernelv vs. 2.6.10 and 2.6.11
    • From: Gilboa Davara

• Prev by Date: HP DC7600 with FC3
• Next by Date: [FC4] Fail to launch realplay
• Previous by thread: HP DC7600 with FC3
• Next by thread: Re: 2.6.9 kernelv vs. 2.6.10 and 2.6.11
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread