On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 11:18:16AM +0000, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote: > Oops, that was too early ... > > > I couple of minutes after I sent my mail I realized that I didn't try > > yet to remove the old versions of cman-kernel, dlm-kernel, GFS-kernel > > and gnbd-kernel. Okay, give it a try, and say what? *Now* the old > > kernel 2.6.11 could be removed without dependency issues. Great! > > Problem not solved. Now it looks like the cman/dlm/GFS/gnbd stuff > requires the previous kernel 2.6.12-1.1398 to be installed. *sigh* > > > # rpm -qa | egrep kernel | sort > cman-kernel-2.6.11.5-20050601.152643.FC4.9 > dlm-kernel-2.6.11.5-20050601.152643.FC4.10 > GFS-kernel-2.6.11.8-20050601.152643.FC4.9 > gnbd-kernel-2.6.11.2-20050420.133124.FC4.43 > > # rpm -e kernel-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 kernel-devel-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 > error: Failed dependencies: > /lib/modules/2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 is needed by (installed) cman-kernel-2.6.11.5-20050601.152643.FC4.9.i686 > /lib/modules/2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 is needed by (installed) dlm-kernel-2.6.11.5-20050601.152643.FC4.10.i686 > /lib/modules/2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 is needed by (installed) gnbd-kernel-2.6.11.2-20050420.133124.FC4.43.i686 > /lib/modules/2.6.12-1.1398_FC4 is needed by (installed) GFS-kernel-2.6.11.8-20050601.152643.FC4.9.i686 The updates for those modules usually lag the kernel release (just like any other out-of-tree module) a little. If you aren't using them, you can just remove them with no adverse effects. (And if you don't know if you are using them -- you aren't). Dave
